We’ve been manually deploying OS updates across our devices, but it’s getting harder to manage as we scale. Came across zero-touch OS updates, are they actually better, or is manual still the safer option?
23 Views
Replies (7)
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
4 days ago
Mar 23, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
Manual is still better in my opinion. You get full control, test updates, pick devices, and roll it out gradually. With full automation, if a buggy update drops, it hits every device at once, and you’ve got a company-wide outage on your hands.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
4 days ago
Mar 23, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
We thought the same initially, but manual didn’t hold up for us. Devices were spread across teams, people kept postponing updates since we let users choose when to restart, and they just… never did. We ended up with inconsistent versions everywhere.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
3 days ago
Mar 24, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
But what about risky updates? You can’t just blindly deploy everything.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
3 days ago
Mar 24, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
We don’t. We still test updates separately. But once we’re confident, zero-touch handles the rollout. Manual just couldn’t keep up with the volume.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
2 days ago
Mar 25, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
Makes sense. So you’re not fully replacing manual then?
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
2 days ago
Mar 25, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
No, we still use manual for testing or edge cases. But for regular updates across the fleet, zero-touch made things way easier.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
2 days ago
Mar 25, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
Fair enough, thanks for sharing your views, folks!
Save
