We’re standardizing Windows app deployments in Hexnode. Simple question: if a vendor gives you both MSI and EXE, which one are you picking? I’m leaning MSI but one of our guys prefers EXE because “it just works.” Curious to know what you guys are doing.
MSI vs EXE for native deploymentSolved
Replies (5)
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
6 days ago
Feb 23, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
If there’s an MSI, I use the MSI. Silent install behaves the way you expect. When you’re deploying to a few hundred machines, predictable > convenient.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
5 days ago
Feb 24, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
Same. EXE installers feel like a gamble. You test /S and it works. Deploy it and suddenly it throws a popup because it needed /silent /norestart or something.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
4 days ago
Feb 24, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
That’s exactly what I’m worried about. We had one EXE that installed fine manually but failed silently through Hexnode because the switch was slightly wrong.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
4 days ago
Feb 25, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
I’ll defend EXE a little.
Sometimes the EXE bundles dependencies the MSI doesn’t. I’ve seen vendors ship a bare MSI that fails if a runtime isn’t present, but the EXE wrapper handles everything.
Marked SolutionPending Review
Participant
3 days ago
Feb 25, 2026
Marked SolutionPending Review
Alright, sounds like MSI wins unless there’s a strong reason not to.
Save