Get fresh insights, pro tips, and thought starters–only the best of posts for you.
Android Enterprise provides different management modes based on who owns a device and how an organization intends employees to use it. Work Profile on Company-Owned devices (WP-C) supports organization-owned devices that employees can use for both work and personal activities, while Profile Owner commonly refers to work profile management on personally owned, or BYOD, devices.
Both approaches create a separate work profile for corporate apps and data. However, device ownership gives administrators additional management capabilities with WP-C while Android continues to protect the employee’s personal space. Google specifically treats work profiles on personally owned and company-owned devices as distinct Android Enterprise solution sets.
The key difference lies in device ownership and the level of device-wide management available to IT.
| Area | Work Profile on Company-Owned | Profile Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Device ownership | Organization | Employee |
| Typical scenario | Corporate device with work and personal use | BYOD |
| Work profile | Yes | Yes |
| Corporate data separation | Yes | Yes |
| Personal data privacy | Maintained | Maintained |
| IT control | Work profile plus supported device-wide controls | Primarily the work profile |
| Provisioning | Company-owned provisioning during device setup | Typically initiated on an already set-up personal device |
On Android 11 and later, provisioning a work profile on a company-owned device through the supported setup flow allows Android to recognize corporate ownership and make additional asset-management and device-security policies available to the device policy controller (DPC).
In the traditional Android Enterprise terminology, the UEM’s DPC acts as the Profile Owner of a managed work profile. On a personally owned device, the organization controls corporate apps, configurations, and data inside that profile without managing the employee’s personal apps and information.
This approach makes Profile Owner management suitable for BYOD programs because organizations can protect business resources without taking control of an employee’s entire device.
WP-C gives organizations a middle ground between BYOD management and fully managed corporate devices. The organization retains ownership of the hardware and receives additional supported device-level management capabilities, while the employee can still maintain a private personal space.
This model works well when organizations want to:
Hexnode UEM supports Android Enterprise Profile Owner enrollment for BYOD scenarios and Work Profile on Company-Owned device enrollment for corporate devices. With WP-C, Hexnode creates a dedicated work profile that separates corporate information from personal data while allowing the organization to maintain supported controls over its device.
Hexnode’s documentation also distinguishes WP-C from Profile Owner based on ownership and enrollment: Profile Owner targets personally owned devices, while WP-C targets organization-owned devices and gives the organization lifecycle control while preserving a private personal profile for the employee.
No. Device Owner mode gives the organization extensive control over the entire device and primarily suits corporate-only use. WP-C separates work and personal spaces so employees can use a company-owned device for both purposes.
Android protects the user’s personal apps, data, and usage information from organizational visibility. However, company ownership allows administrators to enforce certain supported device-wide settings that they cannot apply to ordinary personally owned work-profile devices.
Yes. Hexnode documents WP-C as a company-owned provisioning method that requires device setup through the supported enrollment flow, whereas Profile Owner enrollment typically creates the work profile on a personally owned device.