Get fresh insights, pro tips, and thought starters–only the best of posts for you.
AI systems rarely operate as standalone applications. Most rely on multiple models, datasets, APIs, plugins, open-source libraries, and cloud services working together behind the scenes. An AI Bill of Materials (AIBOM) is a structured record of those components. It helps organizations document what an AI system contains, where its dependencies come from, and how those components interact across the AI lifecycle.
In simple terms, an AIBOM acts as an ingredient list for AI systems.
Organizations are increasingly adopting AI technologies across enterprise environments. However, visibility into AI dependencies and integrations can remain limited.
For example, a generative AI application may depend on:
Without proper documentation, security and compliance teams may struggle to understand how these systems operate or where potential risks exist.
As a result, organizations are exploring AI Bill of Materials frameworks to improve governance, supply chain visibility, and risk management.
An AI Bill of Materials extends traditional Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) concepts by documenting AI-specific components, workflows, and dependencies.
A typical AIBOM may include:
Details about foundation models, fine-tuned models, or third-party AI systems used in production.
Information about datasets used for training, fine-tuning, evaluation, or other AI workflows.
Open-source frameworks, libraries, plugins, and APIs are connected to the AI application.
Cloud environments, containers, orchestration systems, and hardware resources supporting the AI workload.
Ownership, access permissions, compliance requirements, and security controls associated with the AI system.
AI ecosystems can introduce additional software supply chain, governance, and dependency management risks. Many organizations now rely on external AI services, publicly available models, and rapidly changing open-source tooling.
This creates several security challenges:
| Risk | Potential Impact |
| Vulnerable AI dependencies | Exploitation of insecure libraries or frameworks |
| Unverified models | Increased risk of using tampered, untrusted, or insufficiently validated AI models |
| Data governance gaps | Exposure of sensitive or regulated information |
| Shadow AI usage | Unapproved AI tools connected to enterprise systems |
| Poor dependency visibility | Delayed incident response and risk assessment |
Because of this, organizations need stronger visibility into how AI systems are built and maintained.
An AI Bill of Materials helps organizations improve transparency across the AI supply chain. It also supports broader governance and compliance initiatives.
With an AIBOM, teams can:
Over time, AIBOM practices may play a larger role in AI governance and supply chain transparency, like how SBOMs support software security and dependency management.
Hexnode helps IT teams manage enrolled endpoints through compliance policies, app management, device details, and application inventory capabilities.
Administrators can view applications on enrolled devices and use blocklist or allowlist controls to restrict app access or limit which applications can run on supported platforms.
With Microsoft Entra Conditional Access integration, Hexnode can share device compliance status, so access policies can be enforced based on compliant devices.
Yes. An SBOM focuses on software dependencies, while an AI Bill of Materials also documents AI-specific components such as models, training data, prompts, and AI integrations.
AI systems often depend on external APIs, open-source libraries, and third-party models. Better visibility helps organizations identify security, governance, and compliance risks earlier.
Yes. AIBOM practices can support governance initiatives by helping organizations document AI components, ownership, dependencies, and data usage across AI workflows.