Evan
Cole

The MITRE ATT&CK Framework: A Complete Guide

Evan Cole

Oct 30, 2025

15 min read

The MITRE ATT&CK Framework: A Complete Guide

In today’s rapidly evolving threat landscape, understanding how adversaries operate is no longer optional – it’s essential. The MITRE ATT&CK framework has emerged as a gold standard for mapping and analyzing cyberattack behaviors, helping security teams move from reactive defense to proactive threat detection.

Whether you’re a SOC analyst, threat hunter, red teamer, or product leader exploring XDR capabilities, this guide offers a comprehensive look at the MITRE ATT&CK framework – from its origins and structure to real-world applications and integration strategies. By the end, you’ll understand not just what ATT&CK is, but how it can transform your cybersecurity posture.

What is the MITRE ATT&CK framework?

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a globally recognized knowledge base that catalogs the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by cyber adversaries. Developed by the MITRE Corporation, ATT&CK stands for Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge. It serves as a foundational tool for understanding how attackers operate and how defenders can detect, respond to, and mitigate threats effectively.

Purpose and scope of the framework

The primary goal of MITRE ATT&CK is to provide a standardized language and structure for describing adversary behavior. Unlike traditional threat models that focus solely on indicators of compromise (IOCs), ATT&CK emphasizes behavioral patterns – how attackers move through systems, escalate privileges, and exfiltrate data.

Its scope spans across:

  • Enterprise environments (Windows, macOS, Linux)
  • Mobile platforms
  • Cloud infrastructure
  • ICS (Industrial Control Systems)

This makes it a versatile framework for organizations of all sizes and industries.

Who uses MITRE ATT&CK and why it matters

MITRE ATT&CK is widely adopted by:

  • Security Operations Centers (SOCs) for threat detection and incident response
  • Threat hunters to proactively identify malicious activity
  • Red teams for adversary emulation
  • Security vendors to align product capabilities with real-world threats
  • Compliance teams to map controls and gaps

Its importance lies in its ability to bridge the gap between threat intelligence and operational defense, helping teams move from reactive to proactive cybersecurity strategies.

What does MITRE stand for?

MITRE is not an acronym – it’s the name of a nonprofit organization: MITRE Corporation. Founded in 1958, MITRE operates federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) that support various U.S. government agencies in areas like defense, cybersecurity, healthcare, and aviation.

MITRE’s role in cybersecurity and public interest research

In the cybersecurity domain, MITRE plays a pivotal role by:

  • Developing frameworks like ATT&CK and D3FEND
  • Supporting threat intelligence sharing and standardization
  • Conducting evaluations of security products (e.g., MITRE ATT&CK evaluations)
  • Promoting transparency and collaboration across the cybersecurity ecosystem

MITRE’s work is trusted globally because it is vendor-neutral, research-driven, and focused on public good, not for profit.

Origin of the ATT&CK framework

The MITRE ATT&CK framework was first developed in 2013 as part of a MITRE research project called FMX. The goal of FMX was to explore how endpoint telemetry and behavioral analytics could improve post-compromise detection of adversaries operating within enterprise networks.

Why MITRE developed ATT&CK

MITRE recognized a gap in how cybersecurity teams documented and understood adversary behavior. Traditional approaches focused heavily on indicators of compromise (IOCs), which often came too late in the attack lifecycle. ATT&CK was created to shift the focus toward behavioral patterns – how attackers operate once inside a network.

The framework was initially built to support internal testing of detection capabilities, but its value quickly became evident to the broader cybersecurity community.

📈 Key Milestones in ATT&CK’s Development

  • 2013: ATT&CK created as part of MITRE’s FMX project
  • 2015: First public release of the ATT&CK Matrix for Enterprise
  • 2017-2019: Expansion to include Mobile and ICS (Industrial Control Systems)
  • 2020: Introduction of sub-techniques for more granular behavior tracking

Ongoing: Regular updates and evaluations, with the latest version being ATT&CK v17.1 (April 2025)

For a detailed version of history and official documentation, visit the MITRE ATT&CK Version History page.

MITRE ATT&CK framework: Key components and stages

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is built around a structured matrix that categorizes adversary behavior based on real-world observations. It helps cybersecurity teams understand how attackers operate, from initial access to data exfiltration, and provides a common language for threat detection and response.

Overview of the framework’s structure

At its core, the ATT&CK framework is organized into:

  • Tactics – the why behind an adversary’s actions
  • Techniques – the how those actions are carried out
  • Sub-techniques – more detailed variations of techniques

MITRE ATT&CK framework

This structure allows defenders to map observed behaviors to known attack patterns, improving visibility and response accuracy.

Tactics: The adversary’s goals

Tactics represent the high-level objectives an attacker is trying to achieve during an intrusion. Examples include:

Tactic (MITRE ATT&CK) Adversary Behavior Description
Reconnaissance Gathering information about the target
Resource Development Preparing tools and infrastructure for the attack
Initial Access How attackers get into the system
Execution Running malicious code
Persistence Maintaining access over time
Privilege Escalation Gaining higher-level permissions
Defense Evasion Avoiding detection
Credential Access Stealing login credentials
Discovery Learning about the environment
Lateral Movement Moving across systems
Collection Gathering data
Command and Control Communicating with compromised systems remotely
Exfiltration Sending data out
Impact Disrupting or damaging systems

Each tactic corresponds to a phase in the attack lifecycle.

Techniques: How those goals are achieved

Techniques describe the specific methods attackers use to accomplish each tactic. For example:

  • Under Initial Access, a technique might be Phishing
  • Under Persistence, it could be Registry Run Keys

These techniques help defenders understand the exact behavior and plan countermeasures.

Sub-techniques: Granular actions

Sub-techniques provide finer detail within a technique. For instance:

  • Phishing may include sub-techniques like Spear phishing Attachment or Spear phishing Link

This granularity allows for more precise detection and response strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK vs. NIST framework

While both the MITRE ATT&CK framework and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) are widely used in cybersecurity, they serve different purposes and operate at different levels of abstraction. Understanding their differences helps organizations choose the right tools for their security strategy.

Overview of the NIST cybersecurity framework

The NIST CSF, developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, is a high-level policy framework designed to help organizations manage and reduce cybersecurity risk. It is structured around five core functions:

  • Govern
  • Identify
  • Protect
  • Detect
  • Respond
  • Recover

NIST CSF is often used for risk management, compliance, and strategic planning.

Key differences in approach and structure

Feature MITRE ATT&CK NIST CSF
Focus Adversary behavior Risk management
Level Tactical/technical Strategic/policy
Structure Tactics, techniques, sub-techniques Functions, categories, subcategories
Use Case Threat detection, hunting, red teaming Governance, compliance, planning
Audience SOC teams, analysts, engineers CISOs, auditors, risk managers

How they can complement each other

Rather than choosing one over the other, many organizations integrate both frameworks. For example:

  • Use NIST CSF to define strategic goals and governance.
  • Use MITRE ATT&CK to implement and measure technical controls under the “Detect” and “Respond” functions.

This layered approach ensures both policy alignment and operational effectiveness, bridging the gap between leadership and technical teams.

MITRE ATT&CK vs. the Cyber Kill Chain

Both the MITRE ATT&CK framework and the Cyber Kill Chain are widely used models for understanding and defending against cyber threats. While they share a common goal – mapping adversary behavior – they differ significantly in structure, depth, and practical application.

What is the Cyber Kill Chain?

Developed by Lockheed Martin, the Cyber Kill Chain is a linear model that outlines the stages of a cyberattack from reconnaissance to data exfiltration. The seven stages are:

  • Reconnaissance
  • Weaponization
  • Delivery
  • Exploitation
  • Installation
  • Command and Control (C2)
  • Actions on Objectives

It’s primarily used to understand and disrupt the attacker’s progression through a network.

Comparison of stages and terminology

Aspect MITRE ATT&CK Cyber Kill Chain
Structure Matrix of tactics and techniques Linear sequence of attack stages
Focus Post-compromise behavior Full attack lifecycle
Granularity High (includes sub-techniques) Moderate
Use Case Threat detection, hunting, red teaming Attack prevention, perimeter defense
Flexibility Modular and adaptable Fixed sequence

MITRE ATT&CK use cases

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is more than just a reference – it’s a practical tool that empowers cybersecurity teams to understand, detect, and respond to adversary behavior. Its structured approach to tactics and techniques makes it highly adaptable across various security functions.

1. Threat Hunting

ATT&CK provides a behavioral lens for threat hunters to proactively search for signs of compromise. Instead of relying solely on known indicators, hunters can look for patterns that align with specific ATT&CK techniques – like unusual PowerShell usage or credential dumping.

Example: A threat hunter might use ATT&CK to identify lateral movement techniques such as “Remote Services” or “Pass the Hash.”

2. Incident Response

During an active breach, ATT&CK helps responders map observed activity to known adversary behaviors. This accelerates triage, containment, and remediation by providing a clear understanding of what the attacker is doing and what they might do next.

Example: If logs show “Scheduled Task/Job” creation, responders can map it to the “Persistence” tactic and investigate further.

3. SOC Operations

Security Operations Centers (SOCs) use ATT&CK to prioritize alerts, fine-tune detection rules, and assess coverage gaps. By aligning SIEM and EDR alerts with ATT&CK techniques, SOC teams can improve visibility and reduce false positives.

Example: Mapping alerts to ATT&CK helps analysts understand whether their tools detect “Defense Evasion” techniques like “Obfuscated Files or Information.”

4. Red Teaming and Adversary Emulation

Red teams use ATT&CK to simulate real-world attack scenarios based on known threat actor behaviors. This helps organizations test their defenses against realistic adversary tactics and techniques.

Example: A red team might emulate APT29 by following its documented ATT&CK techniques, such as “Spear phishing Link” and “Credential Dumping.”

5. Security Tool Evaluation and Tuning

ATT&CK is also used to benchmark and evaluate security tools. Vendors and security teams can test how well their solutions detect specific techniques and identify blind spots.

Example: During MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations, EDR products are tested against a curated set of techniques to assess detection capabilities.

The Cybersecurity Blueprint
Featured resource

The Cybersecurity Blueprint

Cyberattacks are rising - learn how to build a resilient defense. This blueprint helps you choose the right cybersecurity strategy tailored to your business.

Download White paper

How to integrate MITRE ATT&CK into your security stack

Integrating the MITRE ATT&CK framework into your security stack can significantly enhance your organization’s ability to detect, respond to, and understand cyber threats. Whether you’re running a small SOC or managing enterprise-grade infrastructure, ATT&CK provides a structured way to align your tools and processes with real-world adversary behavior.

Steps to adopt ATT&CK in your organization

1. Educate Your Team

Start by training your security analysts, engineers, and leadership on ATT&CK’s structure – tactics, techniques, and sub-techniques.

2. Assess Current Coverage

Use tools like the MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to visualize which techniques your existing tools detect and where gaps exist.

3. Map Alerts to ATT&CK Techniques

Align your SIEM, EDR, and XDR alerts with ATT&CK techniques to improve context and prioritization.

4. Integrate ATT&CK into Threat Hunting and IR Playbooks

Build playbooks that reference ATT&CK techniques for faster triage and response.

5. Continuously Update and Tune

ATT&CK is regularly updated – ensure your mappings and detection rules evolve with it.

Best practices for mapping alerts and logs

  • Use standardized naming conventions for techniques and tactics in your SIEM dashboards.
  • Tag alerts with ATT&CK technique IDs (e.g., T1059 for Command and Scripting Interpreter).
  • Correlate logs across systems to identify multi-stage attacks mapped to ATT&CK tactics.
  • Automate enrichment using threat intel platforms that support ATT&CK tagging.

Role of ATT&CK in SIEM, EDR, and XDR solutions

  • SIEM: Use ATT&CK to categorize and prioritize alerts, build dashboards, and improve threat correlation.
  • EDR: Align endpoint detections with ATT&CK techniques to identify behavioral patterns like credential dumping or persistence.
  • XDR: Leverage ATT&CK to unify detections across endpoints, networks, cloud, and identity systems – creating a holistic view of adversary activity.

Benefits and challenges of the MITRE ATT&CK framework

The MITRE ATT&CK framework has become a cornerstone of modern cybersecurity operations. Its structured approach to adversary behavior offers numerous advantages – but like any powerful tool, it comes with its own set of challenges.

Key advantages

1. Standardized Threat Language

ATT&CK provides a common vocabulary for describing attacker behavior. This standardization improves communication across teams, vendors, and industries, making collaboration and reporting more consistent and actionable.

2. Improved Visibility

By focusing on tactics and techniques, ATT&CK helps organizations move beyond signature-based detection. It enables defenders to spot behavioral patterns that indicate compromise – even when traditional indicators are absent.

3. Enhanced Collaboration

ATT&CK fosters cross-functional collaboration between red teams, blue teams, threat hunters, and SOC analysts. It also supports purple teaming exercises, where offensive and defensive teams work together using a shared framework.

Common challenges

1. Complexity

The framework is extensive and detailed, which can be overwhelming for teams new to behavioral threat modeling. Understanding and applying hundreds of techniques and sub-techniques requires time and expertise.

2. Resource Requirements

Effective use of ATT&CK often demands advanced tooling, skilled personnel, and continuous tuning. Smaller organizations may struggle to allocate the necessary resources for full integration.

3. Keeping Up with Updates

MITRE regularly updates the framework to reflect evolving threats. Staying current with new techniques, deprecated entries, and version changes requires ongoing effort and vigilance.

Pro tip

Start small – focus on a few high-priority tactics relevant to your environment and gradually expand your coverage. Use tools like the MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to visualize and manage your implementation roadmap.

Common misconceptions about MITRE ATT&CK

Despite its growing popularity, the MITRE ATT&CK framework is often misunderstood. These misconceptions can prevent organizations from fully leveraging its capabilities. Let’s clear up some of the most common myths:

Myth 1: ATT&CK is only for large enterprises

Reality: While ATT&CK is widely used by large organizations, it’s equally valuable for small and mid-sized businesses. The framework is free, publicly available, and scalable. Even lean security teams can use ATT&CK to improve visibility, guide threat hunting, and prioritize defenses.

Myth 2: ATT&CK replaces other frameworks

Reality: ATT&CK is not a replacement for frameworks like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, or the Cyber Kill Chain. Instead, it complements them by providing technical depth and behavioral context. While NIST focuses on governance and risk management, ATT&CK helps operational teams detect and respond to threats.

Myth 3: ATT&CK is only useful for red teams

Reality: Red teams use ATT&CK for adversary emulation, but blue teams, SOC analysts, threat hunters, and incident responders benefit just as much. ATT&CK helps defenders understand attacker behavior, map alerts, and improve detection coverage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MITRE ATT&CK the same as ISO 27001?

No, MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 27001 are fundamentally different.

  • MITRE ATT&CK is a technical framework that catalogs adversary behaviors (tactics and techniques) used in cyberattacks.
  • ISO 27001 is a management standard focused on establishing, implementing, and maintaining an information security management system (ISMS).

While ATT&CK helps with detection and response, ISO 27001 helps with governance and compliance. They can complement each other in a layered security strategy.

How MITRE ATT&CK supports XDR solutions?

MITRE ATT&CK is a natural fit for Extended Detection and Response (XDR) platforms.

  • XDR aggregates data across endpoints, networks, cloud, and identity systems.
  • ATT&CK provides a common language to correlate and classify threats across these domains.
  • It helps XDR solutions prioritize alerts, map attack paths, and automate response based on known adversary behaviors.

Hexnode XDR can leverage ATT&CK to deliver context-rich detections and streamlined investigations.

How often is the MITRE ATT&CK framework updated?

MITRE ATT&CK is updated regularly, typically twice a year, to reflect evolving adversary techniques and community feedback.

  • Updates may include new techniques, refinements, or deprecations.
  • Organizations should monitor the official version history to stay current.

Keeping up with updates ensures your security stack remains aligned with the latest threat landscape.

Is MITRE ATT&CK only for technical teams?

No. While it’s widely used by SOCs and red/blue teams, it also helps CISOs, compliance teams, and security architects align strategy with threat behavior.

Can MITRE ATT&CK be used for compliance or audits?

Yes. ATT&CK can support frameworks like NIST, ISO 27001, and CIS Controls by mapping technical controls to adversary behaviors.

What are the most used ATT&CK techniques?

Techniques like Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) and Phishing (T1566) are among the most frequently observed in real-world attacks.

Can MITRE ATT&CK be automated?

Yes. Many SIEM, SOAR, and XDR platforms integrate ATT&CK mappings to automate detection, enrichment, and response workflows.

Conclusion

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is more than a matrix – it’s a mindset shift. It empowers organizations to think like adversaries, detect threats earlier, and respond with precision. From mapping techniques to enhancing XDR solutions, ATT&CK offers a unified language and actionable insights that bridge the gap between strategy and execution.

As cyber threats grow more sophisticated, frameworks like ATT&CK will continue to play a pivotal role in shaping resilient, intelligence-driven security programs. Whether you’re just getting started or refining your existing stack, integrating ATT&CK is a step toward smarter, stronger defense.

Share

Evan Cole

I write about endpoint management. At Hexnode, I focus on making UEM simple, practical, and accessible for IT teams everywhere.

Resources Image